Prediction of Roscoe Tanner vs Paul Mcnamee Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
R. Tanner vs P. Mcnamee

Roscoe Tanner

USA

2

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Paul Mcnamee

AUS

2

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Tanner 2 - 1 Mcnamee

They have played 7 sets in total, with Roscoe Tanner winning 5 and Paul Mcnamee winning 2. The last match between Paul Mcnamee and Roscoe Tanner was at the Queens Club, 06-06-1983, Round: R2, Surface: Grass, with Paul Mcnamee getting the victory 6-3 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Tanner	2
Mcnamee	1

Last 3 H2H Matches:

(R2) Queens Club(06-06-83)

Stats

Paul Mcnamee

Roscoe Tanner

(SF) Bristol(06-13-81)

Stats

Roscoe Tanner

Paul Mcnamee

(R3) Wimbledon(06-23-80)

Stats

Roscoe Tanner

Paul Mcnamee

R. Tanner vs P. Mcnamee H2H Profile

R. Tanner	Stats	P. Mcnamee
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
66.67% (604-302)	Career Total W/L	52.74% (260-233)
2	Grass	1
17	Titles	4
2	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

R. Tanner vs P. Mcnamee Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Roscoe Tanner has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Paul Mcnamee has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Roscoe Tanner, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Paul Mcnamee has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Roscoe Tanner has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paul Mcnamee has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Roscoe Tanner has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Paul Mcnamee winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Roscoe Tanner has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 73% (W/L 116/42), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 98/59). Paul Mcnamee has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 73% (W/L 63/49), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 35/39).
Player level: In the last year, Roscoe Tanner has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Paul Mcnamee has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Roscoe Tanner winning 2 times and Paul Mcnamee being victorious 1 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Roscoe Tanner winning 5 and Paul Mcnamee winning 2.
The last match between Roscoe Tanner and Paul Mcnamee was at the Queens Club, 06-06-1983, Round: R2, Surface: Grass, with Paul Mcnamee getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Roscoe Tanner has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Paul Mcnamee has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Roscoe Tanner has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paul Mcnamee has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Roscoe Tanner has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paul Mcnamee has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Roscoe Tanner vs Paul Mcnamee Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

R. Tanner vs P. Mcnamee H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

R. Tanner	Stats	P. Mcnamee
2	H2H Matches Won	1
5	Sets Won	2
37	Games Won	34
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
50% (1/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	50% (1/2)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑5 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (2/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/2)

Recent Performance Stats

R. Tanner Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Memphis - 28-01-1985
R2 Zoltan KuharszkyZ. Kuharszky	L	7-5 6-7 6-4	Stats
Tel Aviv - 10-09-1984
R3 Amos MansdorfA. Mansdorf	L	6-4 7-6	Stats
US Open - 28-08-1984
R1 Matt DoyleM. Doyle	L	6-2 6-2 6-4	Stats
Cincinnati - 20-08-1984
R2 Jimmy ConnorsJ. Connors	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
Columbus - 13-08-1984
R3 Tim GulliksonT. Gullikson	L	5-7 6-2 6-1	Stats

View All

P. Mcnamee Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Australian Open - 11-01-1988
R2 Sammy Giammalva JrS. Giammalva	W	6-7 7-6 6-2 4-1 RET	Stats
R1 Bill ScanlonB. Scanlon	W	6-3 6-3 6-3	Stats
R3 Pat CashP. Cash	L	6-1 6-2 6-1	Stats
Adelaide - 28-12-1987
R3 Charles Bud CoxC. Bud	W	6-1 6-2	Stats
R4 Wally MasurW. Masur	L	6-2 6-3	Stats

View All

R. Tanner vs P. Mcnamee Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

R. Tanner	Stats	P. Mcnamee
66.67% (604/302)	YTD Win/Loss	52.74% (260/233)
63.03% (1439/844)	Sets Win/Loss	51.88% (662/614)
54.41% (12342/10342)	Games Win/Loss	50.55% (6201/6067)
66.98% (215/106)	Hard Win/Loss	47.30% (35/39)
62.42% (98/59)	Clay Win/Loss	53.16% (126/111)
64.66% (161/88)	Indoor Hard W/L	51.43% (36/34)
73.42% (116/42)	Grass Win/Loss	56.25% (63/49)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
549.44	Average Opponent Rank	0.26
73.17% (90/33)	Slam W/L	53.57% (45/39)
54.39% (31/26)	Masters W/L	48.00% (12/13)
69.23% (9/4)	Cups W/L	64.71% (11/6)
66.48% (474/239)	Main Tour W/L	50.57% (178/174)
0% (0/0)	Challenger W/L	93.33% (14/1)
67% (505/759)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	53% (204/387)
67% (90/134)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	54% (55/102)
39% (15/38)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
56% (161/288)	Deciding Set Win %	52% (74/143)
86% (596/514)	1st Set Won, Won Match	86% (258/221)
14% (596/82)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	14% (258/36)
28% (299/83)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	17% (234/40)